Donald Trump never liked renewable energies. Its real inconvenience is associated with the increasing efficiency of the industry and its unstoppable expansion.
“If you have a windmill near you, congratulations, your home just lost 75% of its value.Trump said April 2 during a fundraiser for the Congressional Republican National Committee.
“And they say noise causes cancer“Concluded the President of the United States. But the argument he made does not seem to have the sufficient scientific basis.
So far, studies have not shown that infrasound or the low frequency of wind turbines has adverse effects on health people who reside around it.
The claim that wind turbines cause cancer is totally false. Some studies They studied the subject but found no relationship between wind turbines and health problems; This includes strokes and heart attacks. Simply put, the only real problem with wind turbines is that they can be a minor nuisance and create as much noise as traffic.
Trump also claimed that wind power caused massive bird deaths. Although wind turbines kill many birds each year, they do so at a much slower rate than traditional energy sources. A 2009 study found that fossil fuel installations kill nearly 15 times more birds than wind turbines.
If wind turbines don’t cause cancer or kill birds on a massive scale, why is Trump so against them? As it turns out, Trump has a personal history against wind turbines dating back to 2006. That year, Trump bought land in Scotland that he intended to turn into a golf course. A neighboring farm screwed up those plans when it decided to install a wind turbine. Trump sued the farmers but lost in court.
Trump’s stance against wind power also fits very well with GOP energy policy. His administration has launched plans to boost fossil fuel production in the United States and has made it clear that renewables are not high on their priority list.
Despite this, the deployment of renewable energies, and wind power in particular, is unstoppable. Proof of this are the new projects in the United States.
Big bear, renewable electricity.
The wind farm will have 61 turbines and will be located on 24,000 acres in southeast Roswell, New Mexico.
Electricity produced by the plant will be delivered to Tucson via existing transmission lines that connect to Tucson Electric Power’s transmission grid in eastern Arizona.
The project is known as Big Bear and will generate up to 247 megawatts (MW), enough to power nearly 100,000 homes; It will cost around $ 370 million and is expected to be fully operational by the end of 2020.
Navajaro station will close its doors.
As renewables advance, coal-fired power plants lose their competitiveness. One example is the plant that is located in Arizona. It is one of the largest air polluters in the United States and generates 2.25 megawatts.
The factory is becoming obsolete and it is scheduled to close due to its high costs. However, there is resistance from the hundreds of workers who work there.
The United States Department of Energy continues to invest in wind power. Recently, the agency has contributed to other $ 28 million to finance offshore wind turbines, as well as small wind turbines.
- Vertical turbines could be the future of wind farms
- Wind Catcher, the portable wind turbine that can be assembled in 15 minutes
- Why don’t wind turbines freeze in colder climates?
- PowerPod, the wind turbine designed for urban spaces cheaper than solar panels
- Smart system that shuts down turbines when birds approach significantly reduces bird mortality